T.W.

T.W. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County

Good Law
186 Cal. Rptr. 3d 620·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 381·236 Cal. App. 4th 646
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 21, 2015A144528California2,444 words

Opinion

Opinion

Margulies, J.

In this mandamus proceeding, petitioner T.W. seeks a writ compelling respondent superior court to vacate its order denying his petition for modification, filed pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 778, and under authority of Penal Code section 1170.18. Our review of the parties’ briefs and the record lead us to conclude T.W. is entitled to writ relief. Thus, in accordance with our notification to the parties we might do so, we order issuance of a writ directing respondent court to vacate its order denying T.W.’s petition for recall of sentence. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1088; Lewis v. Superior Court (1999) 19 Cal.4th 1232, 1239-1241 [ 82 Cal.Rptr.2d 85 , 970 P.2d 872 ]; Ng v. Superior Court (1992) 4 Cal.4th 29, 35 [ 13 Cal.Rptr.2d 856 , 840 P.2d 961 ]; Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc. (1984) 36 Cal.3d 171, 177-180 [ 203 Cal.Rptr. 626 , 681 P.2d 893 ].) However, because respondent court did not reach the issue of whether T.W. would pose an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety (see § 1170.18, subd. (b)), the matter is remanded for the court to make that determination.

I. Background

T.W. was made a ward of the juvenile court pursuant to Welfare and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.