Stapke & Harris v. Raskov CA2/7CA2/7
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 4/21/15 Stapke & Harris v. Raskov CA2/7CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
STAPKE & HARRIS, LLP, B252176
Cross-complainant and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC433843) v.
DANIEL RASKOV,
Cross-defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Steven J. Kleifield, Judge. Affirmed. Daniel Raskov, in pro. per., for Cross-defendant and Appellant. Sandra J. Gamboa for Cross-complainant and Respondent. _____________ Daniel Raskov appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him liable to his former lawyers, Stapke & Harris, LLP, on the firm’s cross-complaint for unpaid legal fees. Raskov contends Stapke & Harris lacked standing to…