Manuel Estrada v. United States

Good Law
392 F.2d 529·1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7602
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 196822144California472 words

Opinion

Opinion

Manuel Estrada, appellant herein, was convicted after a jury trial of a charge in an indictment filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Southern Division, that he violated 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 111, 1114, in that while he was a prisoner at the United States Penitentiary at McNeil Island he did “willfully, knowingly and forcibly assault” a certain prison officer while such officer was in the performance of his official duties at the penitentiary. A timely appeal was taken to this court which has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .

The evidence established that a dispute arose between appellant and one of the supervisory personnel of the penitentiary while appellant was in a food line in the prison cafeteria. Various members of the prison staff testified as to what occurred, as did various prisoners who were present at the time. The testimony given by these two sets of witnesses as to what occurred varied widely. The jury apparently agreed with the version of the prison personnel in that they found the appellant guilty of assault, although they did not also find him guilty of assault with a dangerous weapon.

The sole error relied upon in this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.