Rosen

Rosen v. Nelson CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 2015D065658California2,652 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/22/15 Rosen v. Nelson CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SAMUEL ROSEN, D065658

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00052830-

CU-DF-NC)

BEATRICE NELSON,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Earl H. Maas

III, Judge. Affirmed.

Samuel Rosen, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

North County Law Firm and Anton C. Gerschler for Defendant and Respondent.

In this defamation case plaintiff Samuel Rosen, appearing in propria persona as he

did in both the trial court and this court in his unsuccessful prior appeal in this matter

(Rosen v. Nelson (July 25, 2013, D062501 [nonpub. opn.] (Rosen I), appeals an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.