Padilla
Padilla v. Moore CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On or about October 25, 2009, Padilla filled out a credit application at Metro that
showed gross monthly income of $8,375, and a monthly mortgage payment of $2,175.
On or about October 26, 2009, Padilla executed a Retail Installment Sale Contract
(contract) for the purchase of a 2009 Nissan Murano from Metro. Metro prepared the
contract, identifying Padilla as the sole buyer. Padilla understood that “[w]henever you
sign as a cosigner, you’re always responsible, no matter what.” Moore was Metro’s
salesman who presented the contract to Padilla for signature.
By signing the contract, Padilla was helping her friend and coworker, Deandra
Stroud, purchase a vehicle “along with me, both, the two of us.” Padilla agreed to be a
cosigner. The plan involved Stroud giving Padilla the money each month to make the
payment. However, on or about November 1, 2011, when Stroud stopped giving Padilla
the money, Padilla went to Stroud’s house, picked up the Murano, and returned it to the
dealership.
On March 6, 2012, Padilla initiated this action against defendants, asserting causes
of action for fraud and declaratory relief—rescission. Padilla…