Darling

Darling v. Pentecost CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 2015E059958California2,571 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The complaint, filed on November 14, 2012, alleges that plaintiff moved into the

mobilehome of her now-deceased coplaintiff Charles Vernoff in October 2012.4 At the

time, Mr. Vernoff was terminally ill, and wished to transfer ownership of his mobilehome

and his tenancy in a site in the park to plaintiff. He apparently did in fact transfer

[footnote continued from previous page]

“Vernoff,” and this is the spelling plaintiff uses in her briefing on appeal. We conclude “Vernoff” is most likely the correct spelling.

2The park’s rules required tenants to be at least 55 years of age; plaintiff was too young to meet that requirement when Mr. Vernoff attempted to transfer ownership of his mobilehome and his tenancy in the park to her.

Further undesignated statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure.

4 In her briefing, plaintiff states that she occupied the mobilehome in September 2012. The discrepancy, however, is not pertinent to any issue we decide in this appeal.

2 ownership of the mobilehome itself; a certificate of title showing plaintiff to be the sole

registered owner as of October 11, 2012, appears in our…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.