County of Riverside v. Miller CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 2015E058117California5,168 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/22/15 County of Riverside v. Miller CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E058117

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1210888)

ANTHONY MILLER, OPINION

Defendant and Respondent;

JASON RAWLINGS,

Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Pamela A. Thatcher,

Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.

Bent Caryl & Kroll, Sergio Bent, and Steven M. Kroll for Plaintiff and Appellant.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent Anthony Miller.

Stone Busailah, Michael P. Stone, Muna Busailah and Robert Rabe for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.