Banks

facts discussed in the following paragraph in this opinion's text are admitted in GA's own summary judgment briefing to the trial court, which is contained in GA's own appellant's appendix. Thus, for purposes of our review, we concluded the record was sufficient and that GA had an adequate opportunity to brief the issues.

There is no change in the judgment.

Defendant, cross-complainant and appellant General Atomics's petition for

rehearing is denied.

BENKE, Acting P. J.

Copies to: All parties

2 Filed 4/2/15 (unmodified opnion)

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL BANKS, D062906

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2009-00084081- v. …