P. v.Barreno CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
Celso Barreno shot and killed a man in San Bernardino, California in 1992. More
than 18 years later, he was arrested at an El Paso, Texas border crossing while attempting
to reenter the United States from Mexico. A jury convicted Barreno of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)1; count 1) and found true the special allegation he personally
used a shotgun to commit the offense (§§ 1203.06, subd. (a)(1)(A), 12022.5, subd. (a)). On
appeal, Barreno contends (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the first degree
murder conviction, (2) the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury regarding voluntary
manslaughter as a lesser included offense of murder, (3) a court-imposed procedure for
impeaching witnesses violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront and cross-examine
witnesses, and (4) he was denied a fair trial by the pre-accusation delay. Finding no merit
in any of these contentions, we affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A
In 1992, Barreno stayed several days a week with his brother's girlfriend, Iris
Amador,2 to help with her son because Barreno's brother was incarcerated. Their
apartment was in…