People v. Duckett CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 23, 2015C076197California997 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/23/15 P. v. Duckett CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C076197

v. (Super. Ct. No. 11F07674)

JOSEPH ANTWION DUCKETT,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Joseph Antwion Duckett asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Our review of the record discloses that the trial court did not impose a mandatory $40 court operations fee or a mandatory $30 court facilities assessment. We will modify the judgment to include the fee and assessment. Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.