Wade
Wade v. Valdez CA4/2
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 24, 2015E059880California3,833 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 4/24/15 Wade v. Valdez CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
SCOT ROSS WADE et al.,
Plaintiffs and Appellants, E059880
v. (Super.Ct.No. MCC1300324)
JACOB ANTHONY VALDEZ et al., OPINION
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Richard J. Oberholzer
and Thomas A. Peterson,† Judges. Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
Law Offices of Jay R. Taylor and Jay Robert Taylor for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Retired judge of the Kern Superior Court assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
† Retired judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court…