Wade

Wade v. Valdez CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 24, 2015E059880California3,833 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/24/15 Wade v. Valdez CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

SCOT ROSS WADE et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants, E059880

v. (Super.Ct.No. MCC1300324)

JACOB ANTHONY VALDEZ et al., OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Richard J. Oberholzer

and Thomas A. Peterson,† Judges. Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Law Offices of Jay R. Taylor and Jay Robert Taylor for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

 Retired judge of the Kern Superior Court assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

† Retired judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.