People v. Jaimes CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 24, 2015F068161California1,448 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

On February 5, 2013, a second amended information was filed against codefendants Julio Perez, Ramon Reyes, and Juan Jaimes.1 The defendants were charged with attempting to deter three different correctional officers. Three counts of attempting to deter an executive officer were alleged as to each officer. (Pen. Code, § 69, subd. (a); counts 1 [Officer Rocha], 2 [Officer Ramirez], & 3 [Officer Garcia].)2 The information alleged one count of battery of a correctional officer (§ 4501.5, count 4 [Officer Ramirez]). The information alleged that Jaimes had two prior serious felony convictions within the meaning of the three strikes law (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i) & 1170.12, subds. (a)- (d)). The jury acquitted all three defendants of count 4, found them guilty of counts 1 and 2, and found them guilty of the lesser included offense of misdemeanor resisting arrest (§ 148, subd. (a)(1)) in count 3. The jury found the strike allegations against Jaimes to be true. At the sentencing hearing, on May 22, 2013, the trial court took the matter of Jaimes’s request to strike one of the prior serious felony allegations, pursuant to People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.