Marriage of McDowell CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 24, 2015E061155California2,660 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/24/15 Marriage of McDowell CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re the Marriage of JANINE and

STEVEN MCDOWELL.

JANINE KRULL MCDOWELL,

E061155

Respondent, (Super.Ct.No. SWD1303046) v.

OPINION

STEVEN D. MCDOWELL,

Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. James T. Warren, Judge.

(Retired judge of the Riverside Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to

art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed.

Katherine Winn for Appellant.

Patterson Law Firm and Alan W. Metcalf for Respondent.

Appellant Steven McDowell (husband) appeals from a temporary spousal support

order requiring him to pay respondent Janine Krull McDowell (wife) the sum of $2,387 a

1 month. Husband contends that the trial court abused its discretion by awarding

temporary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.