People v. Adams CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Aaron, J.
I.
INTRODUCTION
A jury convicted Karen M. Adams of five counts of misdemeanor animal cruelty
(Pen. Code, § 597, subd. (b))1 and one count of failing to obtain a kennel license (San
Diego County Code, § 62.641).2 The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and
placed Adams on summary probation for three years. Adams contends that the
convictions for animal cruelty must be reversed because (1) there was no substantial
evidence that she engaged in criminally negligent acts or omissions that caused a high
risk of great bodily injury or death, and (2) the court prejudicially erred by failing to
instruct the jury sua sponte that a conviction under section 597, subdivision (b) requires a
finding that the defendant created a high risk of death or great bodily injury. We reverse
the animal cruelty convictions on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to support
them.
All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified.
The subject of each of the five counts of animal cruelty is a dog that the San Diego Humane Society (the Humane Society) removed from Adams's residential property. The Humane Society assigned each dog a…