United States v. Irene Li

Good Law
600 F. App'x 579
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 27, 201514-10058California360 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Irene Li (“Li”) appeals her guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 . Li was born in China and her native language is Mandarin. She came to the United States in 1991, and has lived here continuously ever since.

Li’s plea agreement contained an appeal waiver. We enforce an appellate waiver as long as two conditions are met: (1) “the language of the waiver encompasses [the] right to appeal on the grounds raised;” and (2) “the waiver was knowingly and voluntarily made.” United States v. Joyce, 357 F.3d 921, 922 (9th Cir.2004). Both of these conditions are met in Li’s case. We lack jurisdiction to hear an appeal when there is a valid appellate waiver in the plea agreement. United States v. Vences, 169 F.3d 611, 613 (9th Cir.1999). Accordingly, we must dismiss Li’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Li argues that her guilty plea was invalid and the waiver unenforceable principally because of interpretation problems. She claims (1) she was denied her Sixth Amendment right to counsel due to her inability to communicate with her lawyer; and (2) her plea was not voluntarily or knowingly entered because she did not understand…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.