Juan Pavon Grandez v. Loretta E. Lynch

Good Law
600 F. App'x 586
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 27, 201514-71103California570 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Juan Pavón Grandez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Alphonsus v. Holder, 705 F.3d 1031, 1036-37 (9th Cir.2013); Arteaga v. Mukasey, 511 F.3d 940 , 942 n. 1 (9th Cir.2007). We review de novo questions of law, we review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Walckary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009), and we review de novo claims of due process violations, Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We do not consider the evidence Pavón Grandez included in his filings to the court that he did not present in the proceedings below. See Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955, 963 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc) (this court’s review is limited to the administrative record).

We lack jurisdiction to review Pavón Grandez’s contention regarding eligibility for a waiver of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.