Albert

Albert v. Mid-Century Ins. CA2/8

Good Law
187 Cal. Rptr. 3d 211·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 431·236 Cal. App. 4th 1281
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 28, 2015B257792California4,083 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grimes, J.

Plaintiff Shelly Albert appeals from the judgment in favor of defendant Mid-Century Insurance Company after the trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and denied plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary adjudication. Plaintiff sued defendant for breach of the insurance policy and insurance bad faith after defendant denied her tender of the defense of a lawsuit brought by nonparty Henri Baccouche. Plaintiff contends there were triable issues of fact relating to the duty to defend that precluded summary judgment, reasoning she met her burden of establishing the potential for coverage, and that defendant did not demonstrate there was no possibility of coverage. Finding that Mr. Baccouche’s claims against plaintiff arise from nonaccidental conduct, outside the terms of the policy, we affirm the judgment below.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The undisputed facts are these, as established by the parties’ overlapping evidence: Plaintiff purchased a homeowners insurance policy from defendant in January 2008. The policy was in force on January 3, 2011, when plaintiff was sued by her neighbor, Mr. Baccouche, for damage plaintiff caused to his property when plaintiff erected…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.