United States v. Jorge Sosa

Good Law
608 F. App'x 464
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 201514-50072California1,346 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jorge Sosa appeals his convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 1015 (a) and § 1425(a) for knowingly providing false information in a naturalization proceeding and knowingly procuring naturalization in a manner contrary to law. Sosa failed to disclose on his naturalization application his past membership in the Guatemalan Army and his participation in serious crimes during Guatemala’s long-running internal conflict. In 1982, Sosa participated in the Dos Erres massacre, during which Guatemalan soldiers killed approximately 160 civilians. We conclude that Sosa’s convictions and the sentence under § 1425(a) were proper. We remand for the limited purpose of correcting a discrepancy in Sosa’s concurrent sentence under § 1015(a).

1. Sosa first asserts that the naturalization application questions that prompted his provision of false information were fundamentally ambiguous, rendering his convictions invalid. The application asked Sosa “Have you ever committed a crime or offense for which you were not arrested?” Sosa answered “No.” As applied to Sosa in this context, the question was not fundamentally ambiguous. Sosa was involved in the killing of a large number of civilians,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.