United States v. Eduardo Penaloza-Carlon
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 201514-10239California225 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APR 28 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-10239
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:12-cr-00727-JGZ
v.
MEMORANDUM*
EDUARDO PENALOZA-CARLON,
a.k.a. Eduarto Carlon Penaloza,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2015**
Before: GOODWIN, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Eduardo Penaloza-Carlon appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the time-served sentence imposed upon remand for resentencing.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Penaloza-Carlon’s counsel
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to
withdraw as counsel…