Cypress Semiconductor Corp. v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.

Bad Law
186 Cal. Rptr. 3d 486·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 354·236 Cal. App. 4th 243·40 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 68
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 28, 2015H038555California12,143 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rushing, J.

-Plaintiff Cypress Semiconductor Corporation (Cypress) brought this action alleging that defendant Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. (Maxim), had misappropriated a trade secret, or was in the process of doing so, by seeking to hire away specialists in touchscreen technology, a field in which Cypress and Maxim compete. Maxim responded that it was entitled to solicit prospective employment candidates in Cypress’s workforce and that there was no evidence it had acquired, or was seeking to acquire, any trade secret. After failing to secure temporary injunctive relief, and failing to obtain an order placing under seal evidence derived by Maxim from public sources, Cypress dismissed the action. The trial court awarded Maxim its attorney fees pursuant to Civil Code section 3426.4 (section 3426.4), which authorizes such an award to the prevailing party where a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets is found to have been made in bad faith. Cypress contends that this was error because the trial court could not properly find that Maxim was the prevailing party, or that Cypress brought the action in bad faith. We have concluded that (1) the trial court’s findings are free of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.