Novak

Novak v. Fay

Good Law
186 Cal. Rptr. 3d 451·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 351·236 Cal. App. 4th 329
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 28, 2015B256889California4,053 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, Mark S. Novak, seeks to enforce an attorney fee lien on assets held by the Dana Teitler Trust dated August 20, 1999 (Dana Teitler Trust). The present petition to enforce the attorney fee lien arises out of plaintiff’s representation of Douglas Kelly between 2007 and 2012. In 2007, plaintiff and Mr. Kelly executed a contingency attorney fee agreement. The contingency fee agreement granted plaintiff lien rights over any settlement Mr. Kelly received. Under the terms of the fee agreement, plaintiff was to represent Mr. Kelly. In 2011, plaintiff filed a probate petition, which alleged Mr. Kelly was a pretermitted spouse of Ms. Teitler. In 2011, plaintiff negotiated a considerable settlement of the probate dispute. The probate court approved the settlement, which awarded Mr. Kelly a substantial interest in the Dana Teitler Trust in an order filed January 27, 2012.

Mr. Kelly died. On June 20, 2013, plaintiff filed the present petition. Plaintiff’s petition seeks to enforce the attorney lien in the 2007 fee agreement with Mr. Kelly. The probate court denied plaintiff’s petition to enforce the lien against property held by the Dana Teitler Trust.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.