People v. Greenhood CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 2015C076122California3,365 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/29/15 P. v. Greenhood CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

THE PEOPLE, C076122

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 13F4389)

v.

ROBERT ALAN GREENHOOD,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Robert Alan Greenhood appeals from a judgment and the imposition of a suspended sentence following his guilty pleas to felony vandalism (Pen. Code, § 594, subd. (b)(1))1 and misdemeanor infliction of corporal injury on a cohabitant (§ 273.5, subd. (a)). He contends the trial court erred in refusing to award him presentence custody credits for the nearly six months he spent wearing a global positioning system (GPS)

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

1 electronic monitoring…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.