People v. Blankenship CA3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 4/29/15 P. v. Blankenship CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Shasta)
THE PEOPLE, C076177
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 11F7806)
v.
WILLIAM MIKEL BLANKENSHIP,
Defendant and Appellant.
Defendant William Mikel Blankenship seeks correction of a clerical error in the abstract of judgment filed in the instant matter, and the People properly concede the point.1 (People v. High (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 1192, 1200, citing People v. Mitchell (2001) 26 Cal.4th 181, 185.) Therefore, we order the abstract of judgment corrected. In exchange for drug treatment and probation (Pen. Code, § 1210.1), defendant entered a plea of guilty to possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, §…