Gregory v. Saldana CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 2015C073988California4,176 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/29/15 Gregory v. Saldana CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo) ----

KEN GREGORY, C073988

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. CVCV112597)

v.

RAFAEL SALDANA,

Defendant and Respondent.

In California, service of process on an individual defendant may be made by substitute service on “a person apparently in charge of [the defendant’s] office, place of business, or usual mailing address.” (Code Civ. Proc.,1 § 415.20, subd. (b).) Here, when plaintiff Ken Gregory (Gregory) sued defendant Rafael Saldana (Saldana) for breach of oral contract, the process server left the summons and complaint at a location the trial

All further statutory references are to the Code of Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.