Gregory v. Saldana CA3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 4/29/15 Gregory v. Saldana CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Yolo) ----
KEN GREGORY, C073988
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. CVCV112597)
v.
RAFAEL SALDANA,
Defendant and Respondent.
In California, service of process on an individual defendant may be made by substitute service on “a person apparently in charge of [the defendant’s] office, place of business, or usual mailing address.” (Code Civ. Proc.,1 § 415.20, subd. (b).) Here, when plaintiff Ken Gregory (Gregory) sued defendant Rafael Saldana (Saldana) for breach of oral contract, the process server left the summons and complaint at a location the trial