Conway

Conway v. Martin CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 2015B257254California5,176 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

Filed 4/29/15 Conway v. Martin CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

DANIEL CONWAY, B257254

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC501588) v.

JOSEPH PATRICK MARTIN, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ernest M. Hiroshige, Judge. Affirmed. The Dion-Kindem Law Firm, Peter R. Dion-Kindem, for Defendant and Appellant. Law Offices of Cary W. Goldstein, Cary W. Goldstein and Sarah C. Clark, for Plaintiff and Respondent. Defendant and appellant Joseph Patrick Martin, Jr. challenges the trial court’s order staying several of his cross-claims on forum non conveniens grounds. We deny his request for judicial notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.