Roldan

Roldan v. Roldan CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 2015E058825California5,792 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/29/15 Roldan v. Roldan CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ARIEL ROLDAN et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants, E058825

v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVBS1200038)

FERNANDO ROLDAN et al., OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Kirtland L.

Mahlum, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art VI, §21.) Affirmed.

Ariel Roldan and Katiuska M. Roldan, in pro. per., for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Caldwell, Kennedy & Porter and Rose C. Rosado, for Defendants and

Respondents.

Plaintiffs Ariel and Katiuska M. Roldan (Plaintiffs) appeal the grant of the

Respondents Fernando and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.