CA2/1

In re Alexis v. CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 30, 2015B259426California3,094 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

The section 300 petition On August 15, 2014, the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) filed a petition under section 300, subdivision (b)(1) (failure to protect from risk of serious physical harm or illness). As sustained, the petition alleged that Father had a history of illicit drug abuse and was a current abuser of amphetamine and methamphetamine, rendering him incapable of providing regular care for the minors. Father had a positive drug test for amphetamine and methamphetamine on August 5, 2014, and his use of illicit drugs endangered the minors’ physical health and safety and created a detrimental home environment. Reports prior to the jurisdictional and dispositional hearing We summarize DCFS’s reports in connection with the jurisdictional and dispositional hearing. On July 30, 2014, DCFS received a referral of “emotional abuse,” informing DCFS that, among other things, Father had made death threats to Mother’s boyfriend, Robert A.; Father was asking the minors to request grocery money from Mother; and Father’s recent weight loss indicated that Father might still be using illicit drugs. Mother and the minors were not living with Father.

1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.