Abner Gonzalez-Delgado v. Loretta E. Lynch

Good Law
601 F. App'x 542
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 201513-72624California247 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Abner Jonathan Gonzalez-Delgado, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that, even if Gonzalez-Delgado was a member of a particular social group, he failed to establish past persecution or a clear probability of future harm on account of a protected ground. See Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 741 (9th Cir.2009) (“[T]o demonstrate that a protected ground was ‘at least one central reason’ for persecution, an applicant must prove that such ground was a cause of the persecutors’ acts.’’); see also Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir.2010) (petitioner’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.