American Pipe and Construction Co. v. Pence

Good Law
393 F.2d 568·1968 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,424·1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7323
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 196822576California3,090 words

Opinion

Opinion

393 F.2d 568 AMERICAN PIPE AND CONSTRUCTION CO., Petitioner, v. Honorable Martin PENCE, Chief United States District Judge, District of Hawaii, Respondent, and The State of California et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. 22541 A-G. No. 22574. No. 22575. No. 22576 A-L. No. 22577. No. 22578 A-C. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. April 15, 1968. J. O. Sullivan (argued), George W. Jansen, Wayne M. Pitluck, San Diego, Cal., Paul B. Wells, of Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, San Diego, Cal., for petitioner. Charles S. Burdell (argued), Wm. H. Ferguson, Donald McL. Davidson, T. J. Grennan, C. David Sheppard, William E. Kuhn, Ferguson & Burdell, Seattle, Wash., Knapp, Gill, Hibbert & Stevens, Los Angeles, Cal., Kase Higa, County Atty., County of Maui, Wailuku, Hawaii, Donald Paul Hodel, Portland, Or., Thomas as M. Jenkins, San Francisco, Cal., Keating & Sterling, Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel, Los Angeles, Cal., Broad Busterud & Khourie, San Francisco, Cal., Adrian Kuyper, County Counsel, Santa Ana, Cal., Stanley Ling, Corporation Counsel, City & County of Honolulu, Honolulu, Hawaii, Thomas Lynch, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., Stearns,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.