Motyl

Motyl v. City of San Diego CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 5, 2015D066174California2,453 words

Opinion

Opinion

Irion, J.

Filed 5/5/15 Motyl v. City of San Diego CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MATTHEW GERARD MOTYL, D066174

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-00074087-CU-

BC-CTL)

CITY OF SAN DIEGO et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Joel M.

Pressman, Judge. Affirmed.

Matthew Gerard Motyl, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Jan I. Goldsmith, City Attorney, and Michael J. McGowan, Deputy City Attorney,

for Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiff Matthew Gerard Motyl (Plaintiff) filed a complaint asserting one cause of

action for breach of contract against defendants City of San Diego (City) and Danell

Scarborough…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.