Marriage of Reade and Roizman CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 5, 2015B253362California6,979 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

Filed 5/5/15 Marriage of Reade and Roizman CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

In re Marriage of VICTORIA READE and B253362

KEITH ROIZMAN.

(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BD512241)

VICTORIA READE,

Appellant,

v.

KEITH ROIZMAN,

Respondent

WENDY L. SHEINKOPF,

Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michelle Williams Court, Judge. Affirmed. Roberta L. Murawski for Appellant. No appearance for Respondent. Wendy L. Sheinkopf, in pro. per. for Respondent Sheinkopf. Victoria Reade appeals an order requiring her to pay $73,000 in fees to respondent Wendy L. Sheinkopf, an attorney who represented Reade’s ex-husband, Keith Roizman, during the parties’ dissolution proceedings. Reade contends that the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.