People v. Deremer CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 6, 2015A143483California1,974 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bruiniers, J.

BACKGROUND

Deremer did not obtain a certificate of probable cause (Pen. Code, § 1237.5; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.304(b)), and no cognizable issues are before us relating to his guilt or to his pleas. (People v. Mendez (1999) 19 Cal.4th 1084, 1097, 1099; People v. Panizzon (1996) 13 Cal.4th 68, 74.) His appeal is only from his “sentence or other matters occurring after the plea.” Facts underlying his three offenses are therefore irrelevant, and we limit our discussion to the procedural history. In case No. CR1200283, Deremer entered a guilty plea to one felony count of possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350).2 On April 18, 2012, imposition of sentence was suspended, and Deremer was placed on Proposition 36 probation for a term of three years, with a condition of 181 days in the county jail. He received sentence credits for 91 days of actual custody, and 90 days of conduct credits. As far as the record shows, no appeal was taken. On May 17, 2012, Deremer entered a guilty plea to a new felony charge of possession of a controlled substance (§ 11350) in case No. CR1201996A. He admitted violating probation in case No. CR1200283. On August 6, 2012, he was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.