Nezami
Nezami v. Poladian CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Aaron, J.
I.
INTRODUCTION
Mohammad Nezami executed a promissory note in favor of respondent Abraham
Poladian (Abraham) in the amount of $473,000. Nezami and Abraham both executed a
promissory note in the amount of $1.02 million and a deed of trust in favor of respondent
Jacqueline Poladian (Jacqueline) on a ranch (the Ranch) that Nezami and Abraham
owned. At the time the notes were executed, Nezami and Abraham were business
partners. Nezami filed this action against respondents, seeking to avoid his obligation to
pay Abraham and to prevent foreclosure on the Ranch by Jacqueline. Abraham filed a
cross-complaint in which he sought enforcement of the note. After a bench trial, the trial
court entered judgment in favor of respondents on Nezami's claims and in favor of
Abraham on his cross-claim. The trial court also entered an order awarding respondents
attorney fees based on attorney fee provisions in the promissory notes and deed of trust.
Nezami, appearing in propria persona, appeals from the judgment and the attorney
fee order. On appeal, Nezami claims that two attorneys and the defendant had a "conflict
of interest" in light of the facts of this case; the trial court…