In re B.B. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 7, 2015C077750California314 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

In May 2014 Rene T. received word that her daughter, T.T., was in an altercation with the minor at school. During the altercation, T.T.’s cellular phone went missing. As

1 a result of the altercation, T.T. suffered a concussion that caused her to miss the final four weeks of school. Rene missed five days of work to stay home with T.T. after she was injured. Rene missed another six hours of work to testify at the restitution hearing, and she had to replace T.T.’s cellular phone. In July 2014 the minor admitted misdemeanor charges of battery with serious bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 243, subd. (d)), unlawful invasion of privacy (Pen. Code, § 647, subd. (j)(1)), and petty theft (Pen. Code, § 484, subd. (a)). The juvenile court declared the minor a ward of the court and placed her on informal probation for six months. The maximum time of confinement was set at one year four months. Following a later restitution hearing, the juvenile court ordered the minor to pay $1,669 in victim restitution but did not make restitution a condition of her probation.

DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent the minor on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.