Jose Torres-Valdivias v. Loretta E. Lynch

Good Law
786 F.3d 1147·2015 WL 2146726·2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 7671
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 8, 201511-70532California3,418 words

Opinion

Opinion

Clifton, J.

ORDER

The opinion filed September 5, 2014 [ 766 F.3d 1106 ], is AMENDED as follows:

1. Section III.C.3, the four-paragraph section that appears on pages 15 [ 766 F.3d at 1113-14 ] through 17 [ 766 F.3d at 1114-15 ] of the slip opinion, including footnotes 4 and 5, is .deleted.

2. The third sentence of the first full paragraph on page 4 [ 766 F.3d at 1108 ] of the slip opinion currently reads as follows:

The sentence is amended to read as follows:

3. The last sentence of the first paragraph of § III.C on page 11 [ 766 F.3d at 1111-12 ] of the slip opinion currently reads as follows:

The sentence is amended to read as follows:

4. The third sentence of the first paragraph of § IV on page 17 [ 766 F.3d at 1114-15 ] of the slip opinion currently reads as follows:

The sentence is amended to read as follows:

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Silverman and Clifton have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Watson has so recommended.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.