Patino

Patino v. EMC Mortgage CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 8, 2015A140665California3,651 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dondero, J.

Filed 5/8/15 Patino v. EMC Mortgage CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

DANGEL PATINIO,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A140665

v. EMC MORTGAGE, LLC et al., (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG12657347) Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiff Dangel Patinio appeals from a judgment dismissing his first amended complaint against defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Chase), EMC Mortgage, LLC (EMC), and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) after the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend.1 Plaintiff contends he has adequately pleaded causes of action for wrongful foreclosure, quiet title, fraud, violation of Civil Code section 2932.5, unfair competition (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.), and unjust enrichment, all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.