Nihar Desai v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
602 F. App'x 392
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 201513-55725California746 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Plaintiff Nihar Desai appeals the district court’s judgment and denial of administrative mandamus in an action related to the classification of his hotel under Los Ange-les’s Residential Hotel Unit Conversion and Demolition Ordinance (“Ordinance”). L.A. Mun.Code §§ 47.70-47.89. We affirm.

The district court correctly concluded that Plaintiffs challenge to the designation of the hotel itself as a residential hotel was time-barred. A petition for writ of mandate challenging a local agency decision must be filed within ninety days of the date the decision becomes final. Cal.Code Civ. Proc. § 1094.6(b). The Los Angeles Housing Department (“LAHD”) notified Plaintiff of the residential-hotel determination in September 2008, and the determination became final two months later when Plaintiff failed to appeal. See id. Plaintiff thus had until February 2009 to seek a writ of mandate, but he did not do so until November 2010. His challenge was therefore time-barred. Plaintiffs counter-arguments are without merit.

Plaintiffs procedural due process claim fails because LAHD was not required to hold a hearing prior to its initial determinations or to bear the burden of proof in any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.