Gooding v. Hooper

Good Law
394 F.2d 146
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 196822669_1California336 words

Opinion

Opinion

394 F.2d 146 Honorable William H. GOODING, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, and Robert K. Corbin, County Attorney of Maricopa County, Arizona, Appellants, v. Ron Kent HOOPER and Purvis Ole Scroggs, Appellees. No. 22669. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. March 28, 1968, Certiorari Denied May 20, 1968, See 88 S.Ct. 1811 . Norval C. Jesperson (argued), Asst. Atty. Gen., Mark Wilmer (argued), Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen. of the State of Arizona, Phoenix, Ariz., for appellants. Alan Philip Bayham (argued), John P. Frank, John J. Flynn, Robert A. Jensen, of Lewis, Roca, Beauchamp & Linton, Henry Zalut, Henry J. Florence, Phoenix, Ariz., Seymour L. Ellison, of Belli, Ashe, Ellison, Choulos, Cone & Harper, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees. Before CHAMBERS, POPE and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges. AMENDED DECISION ON APPEAL PER CURIAM: 1 Assuming jurisdiction in the district court to entertain and decide the petition for a temporary injunction, without deciding its jurisdiction, we find under the circumstances of this case that the district court should have denied the temporary injunction which it issued. Therefore, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.