Stapke & Harris v. Raskov CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 12, 2015B252176MCalifornia6,820 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/12/15 Stapke & Harris v. Raskov CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

STAPKE & HARRIS, LLP, B252176

Cross-complainant and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC433843) v.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

DANIEL RASKOV, AND DENYING REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] Cross-defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein April 21, 2015 be modified as follows: 1. On page 2 in the third full paragraph beginning with “Raskov and Aronson paid Stapke & Harris $91,000,” the term “$91,000” is changed to “just under $93,500” so that the sentence reads: Raskov and Aronson paid Stapke & Harris just under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.