Kahn

Kahn v. Ameresco, Inc. CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 2015B243169California2,760 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Filed 5/13/15 Kahn v. Ameresco, Inc. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

TAHSEENA KAHN, B243169

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. PC050348) v.

AMERESCO, INC., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Randy Rhodes, Judge. Affirmed. Tahseena Kahn, in pro. per., Plaintiff and Appellant. Maranga • Morgenstern, Robert A. Morgenstern, Ninos Saroukhanioff and Dennis S. Newitt for Defendants and Respondents Ameresco, Inc., P&J Electrical, Inc. and Baymarr Constructors, Inc. Brumfield & Hagan and Robert H. Brumfield, III, for Defendants and Respondents Old Republic Surety and Western Surety. —————————— Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.