In re Coleman

Good Law
186 Cal. Rptr. 3d 922·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 413·236 Cal. App. 4th 1013
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 14, 2015A142734California3,150 words

Opinion

Opinion

Simons, J.

When a state prison inmate commits a felony, Penal Code section 1170.1, subdivision (c) (Section 1170.1(c)), provides that any consecutive sentence for such felony “shall commence from the time the person would otherwise have been released from prison.” This case requires that we interpret Section 1170.1(c) to determine whether an inmate serving a life term who commits a custodial offense is entitled to have his consecutive sentence for that offense begin on the date he completes his base term or on the date he is found suitable for parole. The trial court adopted the former interpretation, granted the petition for habeas corpus filed by Damien Coleman (petitioner), and ordered that petitioner be released from prison on the ground that California’s Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) miscalculated his release date. Kevin Chappell (appellant), warden at San Quentin State Prison, appeals from the superior court’s order and contends the superior court erred in its construction of Section 1170.1(c). Appellant argues the term for the custodial offense did not commence until the Board of Parole Hearings’s (Board) determination that petitioner was suitable for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.