People v. Blocker CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 14, 2015A141733California4,094 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/14/15 P. v. Blocker CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A141733

v. KEVIN JOHN BLOCKER, (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. 1214964) Defendant and Appellant.

In re KEVIN JOHN BLOCKER

A143540

on Habeas Corpus.

Defendant appeals a judgment entered following his no contest plea to five counts arising out of an incident involving domestic violence. On appeal, he challenges the denial of his Marsden1 motion made during the sentencing hearing. In his petition for habeas corpus, defendant argues that his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance with respect to his plea bargain.2 We shall affirm the judgment and deny the writ petition.

1 People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.