Faton
Faton v. Ahmedo
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 15, 2015D066119California4,401 words
Opinion
Opinion
Haller, J.
Filed 4/22/15; pub. order 5/15/15 (see end of opn.)
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SINA FATON, D066119
Respondent,
v. (Super. Ct. No. DV037475)
BASHAR AHMEDO,
Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Edlene C.
McKenzie, Patricia Guerrero, Judges. Affirmed.
Sina Faton, in pro. per., for Respondent.
Carl M. Hancock for Appellant.
Bashar Ahmedo appeals from an order requiring him to pay attorney fees incurred
by Sina Faton to obtain a domestic violence restraining order against him. He asserts the
fee award was improper because the fees were not requested in a timely or proper manner
and they were unsupported by the evidence. We reject these contentions and affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
As we shall detail below, Ahmedo and Faton initially represented themselves in
the proceedings before the trial court, which solely concerned the issue of a Domestic
Violence Restraining Order (DVRO). The trial court granted a DVRO against Ahmedo;