Yardley

Yardley v. County of Imperial CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 15, 2015D064757California8,313 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haller, J.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Factual Summary

Our factual summary is based solely on plaintiffs' offer of proof. For purposes of

this opinion, we assume the truth of the stated facts and all reasonable inferences from

All further unspecified statutory references are to the Government Code. 2 those facts. (See Cooper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. (2009) 177

Cal.App.4th 876, 891 (Cooper).)

The traffic collision occurred at the intersection of Shank Road (a County road)

and Highway 115 (a state highway). Shank Road runs east-west. Highway 115 runs

north-south. Shank Road has a 55-miles-per-hour speed limit, and Highway 115 has a

65-miles-per-hour speed limit.

Shortly before the accident, three couples (plaintiffs or plaintiffs' parents) were in

a vehicle traveling south on Highway 115 toward Shank Road. At the same time, Cordell

Perkins was traveling eastbound on Shank Road toward Highway 115. The drivers of

both vehicles were driving at or just below the speed limit.

There are no traffic controls for Highway 115 drivers at the Shank Road

intersection. Shank Road has a stop sign for eastbound drivers just before Highway 115.

However, within a day or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.