People v. Quintanilla CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 15, 2015B258482California3,325 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/15/15 P. v. Quintanilla CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE, B258482

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA100177-01) v.

NELSON ORLANDO QUINTANILLA,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,

Craig Richman, Judge. Affirmed.

Alex Green, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

______________________________________________ In August 1994, defendant and appellant Nelson Orlando Quintanilla pleaded no contest to possession of a controlled substance for sale. Twenty years later, Quintanilla filed a petition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.