People v. Galaviz CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 18, 2015D066519California229 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On July 17, 2014 a parole agent contacted Galaviz at the intersection of Union

Street and West Harbor Street. Galaviz told the agent he had consumed a beer. A search

of his belongings produced the remainder of a six pack of beer.

The location where Galaviz was sitting was within 250 feet of the Children's

Museum and children were playing on the nearby playground.

2 A search of Galaviz's person produced a thumb drive containing nude pictures of

teenage girls as well as adult women. Galaviz was then arrested for the alleged

violations.

DISCUSSION

As we have indicated, appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Wende, supra,

25 Cal.3d 436, requesting this court to review the record for error. To assist this court in

its review, and in accordance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders),

counsel has identified the following possible, but not reasonably arguable issue:

Whether the parole conditions, which were the basis of the revocation, were valid

conditions of parole that were reasonably related to his commitment offense and/or the

prevention of future criminality?

We have reviewed the entire record for error pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.