In re Jake P. CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 18, 2015F069144California5,909 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Prior Proceedings On August 16, 2011, the Tulare County District Attorney filed a juvenile wardship petition under section 602, alleging Jake committed second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211). According to the probation officer’s detention/intake assessment, Jake and two other subjects assaulted the victim and stole a pizza from him. On October 3, 2011, Jake admitted the lesser offense of felony grand theft from the person. (Id., § 487, subd. (c).) On October 17, 2011, Jake was declared a ward of the court and placed on probation on various terms and conditions.2 On January 20, 2012, the Tulare County Probation Department filed notice of a violation of probation (§ 777), alleging Jake failed to obey curfew, attend school regularly, not associate with gang members or associates or possess gang paraphernalia, and obey his mother. That same day, the district attorney filed a second juvenile

Jake is sometimes referred to as Jacob in the record. According to him and his mother, however, his first name is Jake. DJJ is sometimes referred to as the Division of Juvenile Facilities. (See, e.g., Welf. & Inst. Code, § 1710, subd. (a); further statutory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.