Currie

Currie v. Garcia CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 18, 2015B254031California648 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kriegler, J.

Filed 5/18/15 Currie v. Garcia CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

MANEVA A. CURRIE, B254031

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC117168) v.

BENEDICT GARCIA,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard A. Stone, Judge. Affirmed. Maneva A. Currie, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Carlson Law Group, Mark C. Carlson, Warren K. Miller, for Defendant and Respondent. ________________________ Plaintiff and appellant Maneva A. Currie appeals from the judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained the demurrer of defendant and respondent Benedict Garcia and denied leave to amend. We affirm. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.