Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 201512-57302California3,230 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CINDY LEE GARCIA, No. 12-57302 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:12-cv-08315-
MWF-VBK
GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation; YOUTUBE, LLC, a California limited liability company, AMENDED Defendants-Appellees, ORDER
and
NAKOULA BASSELEY NAKOULA, an individual, AKA Sam Bacile; MARK
BASSELEY YOUSSEF; ABANOB
BASSELEY NAKOULA; MATTHEW
NEKOLA; AHMED HAMDY; AMAL
NADA; DANIEL K. CARESMAN;
KRITBAG DIFRAT; SOBHI BUSHRA;
ROBERT BACILY; NICOLA BACILY;
THOMAS J. TANAS; ERWIN
SALAMEH; YOUSSEFF M. BASSELEY;
MALID AHLAWI,
Defendants. Filed May 18, 2015
Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge
Order by Chief Judge Thomas; Dissent by Judge Reinhardt
GARCIA V. GOOGLE
SUMMARY*
Copyright / Preliminary Injunction
Chief Judge Thomas issued an amended order denying rehearing en banc of the three-judge panel’s order directing Google and YouTube to remove immediately all or part of the film Innocence of Muslims from their platforms and to prevent further uploads.