Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 201512-57302California3,230 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CINDY LEE GARCIA, No. 12-57302 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:12-cv-08315-

MWF-VBK

GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation; YOUTUBE, LLC, a California limited liability company, AMENDED Defendants-Appellees, ORDER

and

NAKOULA BASSELEY NAKOULA, an individual, AKA Sam Bacile; MARK

BASSELEY YOUSSEF; ABANOB

BASSELEY NAKOULA; MATTHEW

NEKOLA; AHMED HAMDY; AMAL

NADA; DANIEL K. CARESMAN;

KRITBAG DIFRAT; SOBHI BUSHRA;

ROBERT BACILY; NICOLA BACILY;

THOMAS J. TANAS; ERWIN

SALAMEH; YOUSSEFF M. BASSELEY;

MALID AHLAWI,

Defendants. Filed May 18, 2015

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge

Order by Chief Judge Thomas; Dissent by Judge Reinhardt

GARCIA V. GOOGLE

SUMMARY*

Copyright / Preliminary Injunction

Chief Judge Thomas issued an amended order denying rehearing en banc of the three-judge panel’s order directing Google and YouTube to remove immediately all or part of the film Innocence of Muslims from their platforms and to prevent further uploads.

Dissenting from the initial denial of emergency rehearing en…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.