People v. Eaton CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 19, 2015C074520California1,354 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

We take the facts from the record of defendant’s most recent conviction. (People v. Trujillo (2006) 40 Cal.4th 165, 180-181.) A police officer testified at trial that he searched defendant’s pockets when he arrested him on June 7, 1995, discovering several baggies containing methamphetamine, a pouch with a hypodermic syringe, and a knife with a “five, almost a six-inch blade.” The officer said the blade poked out of defendant’s pants pocket but was concealed by an oversized shirt. A jury found defendant guilty of possessing methamphetamine and cocaine and also of violating section 12020, subdivision (a), by “carrying concealed upon his person a dirk or dagger.” The trial court instructed the jury that the words dirk and dagger are synonyms referring to “any knife or other instrument with or without a handguard that is primarily designed or constructed to be a stabbing instrument designed to inflict great bodily injury or death.” The trial court determined that defendant had two prior felony convictions (for a robbery in 1986 and for firing a weapon at a vehicle in 1992) and that his sentence was subject to the “three strikes” provisions of sections 667 and 1170.12. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.